Today the UFC’s personal anti doping partner USADA revealed that Bruno Arruda da Silva was handed a 2 year suspension for ingesting boldenone.
Arruda da Silva evaluated positive for boldenone as well as its metabolite as the result of a urine sample collected out-of-competition on may 27, 2019.
Arruda da Silva rejected wrongdoing as well as blamed the ingestion on meat contamination. A offer might not be reached with USADA as well as the alleged infraction as well as punishment went to arbitration for adjudication.
Arbitrator Janie Soublière rejected Arruda da Silva’s support noting his support provided nothing much more than speculation. In rejecting this support Soubliere noted as follows:
66. While the Applicant provides a hypothesis that the discovering of Boldenone came from contaminated meat, which, as a Brazilian, he eats significant quantities of daily, he does not offer any type of corroborating evidence to this effect.
67. Although consideration was provided to the truth that contaminated meat might be a possible source of the Boldenone, this possibility is rejected for the complying with reasons. Firstly, the Applicant stops working to offer any type of details about the meat he consumed, when he consumed it as well as in which quantities; supporting mitigating evidence that is important to any type of such cases. The Applicant likewise stops working to establish that any type of meat he may have eaten in Brazil was in truth contaminated as well as failed to determine any type of possible cattle ranch that may have utilized Boldenone as a growth agent. Finally, the estimated concentration of Boldenone detected in his sample does not support his hypothesis.
68. If meat contamination really was a valid theory, the Applicant might have as well as ought to have done whatever in his power to recollect what he ate in the days prior to his sample collection as well as attempted to trace any type of meat he consumed back to the vendor as well as ultimately the breeder, as other have performed in his position. No such evidence was presented.
69. In any type of event, the respondent has essentially closed the door on this hypothesis by submitting compelling as well as conclusive evidence as well as statement from Dr. Bradley Johnson, a cattle market expert, which confirms that the Applicant’s disagreement to the impact that “it cannot be ruled out that boldenone is typically utilized in beef cattle in Brazil” is lawfully insufficient as well as factually inaccurate with respect to Brazilian beef.
70. Dr. Johnson’s statement is that Boldenone as well as other growth promoters are not enabled in Brazil. Dr. Johnson has himself been to abattoirs as well as cattle ranches in Brazil numerous times as well as confirms that Boldenone is prohibited in the production as well as growth of Camiseta Real Betis Balompie cattle in Brazil. He likewise discusses that as one of the largest beef producers in the world, 20% of Brazil’s beef is mostly exported in the EU, who prohibits the entry of meat including Boldenone or other growth agents. He affirms that is extremely implausible, with a 0.01% margin of error, that a positive discovering of Boldenone might come from meat contamination. This is since the Brazilian GDP depends on the export beef market as well as its Ministry of Agriculture has set up extremely stringent procedures to guarantee Camiseta Selección de fútbol de Senegal that none of its meat producers utilize anabolic agents.
71. Finally, based on Dr. Johnson’s calculation of the maximum residue limit that may be discovered in the tissue of cattle after being injected with growth promoters, even if the meat he may have eaten was contaminated, which he states is improbable, Camiseta Sporting CP the Applicant would have had to take in inordinate amounts of meat in the 24 hours before the test, 2.7 kg to be exact. Dr. Johnson likewise states he was being rather liberal in his calculation as well as proceeded on the assumption that 100% of the steroid had been absorbed in the meat,
which is extremely unlikely. While all of Dr. Johnson’s calculations are suppositions, they are not baseless speculation, as argued by the Applicant. They are based on scientific knowledge, experience, as well as his comprehensive understanding of maximum residue limits for veterinary compounds utilized in animal production. Dr. Johnsons’ suppositions as well as evidence are therefore sufficiently compelling for the Arbitrator to wrap up that it is implausible that the discovering of Boldenone in the Applicant’s urine sample was triggered by his ingestion of an inordinate amount of Brazilian meat extraordinarily contaminated with Boldenone.
72. during the hearing, the Applicant alluded to the truth that he likewise ate meat while in Kazakhstan. However, there is no supporting evidence brought forth that Boldenone is utilized in cattle production in Kazakhstan, no evidence created that the Applicant was ever in Kazakhstannull
